PETROHAWK ENERGY CORP HK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1059324Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Conner & WintersFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Horwitz & BeamFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C.First linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Apr 2009 · Text search only · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Stradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Thompson & Knight | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Conner & Winters | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Horwitz & Beam | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.24 | 0.97 | 0.47 |
| Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 27 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.07 |
| Holland & Hart | Apr 2009 | Text search only | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 97 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.79 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. MorphySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Krishna VeeraraghavanSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Eric M. SwedenburgSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Kirk TuckerThompson & KnightFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- William T. Heller IVThompson & KnightFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Lawrence W. HorwitzHorwitz & BeamFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Eric D. SchoenbornStradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. MorphySullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Krishna VeeraraghavanSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Eric M. SwedenburgSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Lee MeyersonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Kirk TuckerThompson & Knight | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| William T. Heller IVThompson & Knight | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Lawrence W. HorwitzHorwitz & Beam | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.25 | 1.20 | 1.67 |
| Eric D. SchoenbornStradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 55 | 1.64 | 0.20 | 1.96 |