CUMULUS MEDIA INC CMLS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1058623Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Mar 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2018 to Dec 2025
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Holleb & CoffFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.50× · Went dark 10.59× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Maynard Cooper & GaleFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Dow LohnesFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wiley ReinFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Kennedy Covington Lobdell & HickmanFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Dickstein ShapiroFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Holleb & Coff | Jun 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.50 | 10.59 | 1.38 |
| Paul Hastings | Mar 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Maynard Cooper & Gale | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 43 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Dow Lohnes | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 36 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Wiley Rein | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 38 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 1.15 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Kennedy Covington Lobdell & Hickman | May 2006 | Text search only | 53 | 1.04 | 0.38 | 1.29 |
| Dickstein Shapiro | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark L. HansonJones DayFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- William F. SchwitterPaul HastingsFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark L. HansonJones Day | Jun 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| William F. SchwitterPaul Hastings | Mar 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.21 |