RAINBOW RENTALS INC RBOW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1058441Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz & Arnson Co., L.P.A.First linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz & Arnson Co., L.P.A. | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Norton Rose | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Winstead PC | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas W. HughesFulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 0.98 |