Rogue One, Inc. ROAG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1058330Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sharon D. Mitchell Attorney at LawFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- VANDERKAM & SANDERSFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharon D. Mitchell Attorney at Law | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.61 | 2.28 | 0.63 |
| VANDERKAM & SANDERS | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 23 | 2.07 | 1.83 | 0.40 |
| K&L Gates | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Owen NaccaratoNaccarato & AssociatesFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 2.15× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Sharon D. MitchellSharon D. Mitchell Attorney at LawFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 2.57× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Troy J. RilloK&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.98× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Brian F. FaulknerFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.63× · Went dark 2.42× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen NaccaratoNaccarato & Associates | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.07 | 2.15 | 0.64 |
| Sharon D. MitchellSharon D. Mitchell Attorney at Law | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.49 | 2.57 | 0.61 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Troy J. RilloK&L Gates | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.52 | 1.98 | 0.57 |
| Brian F. Faulkner | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.63 | 2.42 | 0.42 |
| David Gonzalez | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |