MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD MRVL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1058057Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Covington & Burling | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Shaw Pittman | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eve N. HowardHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lillian TsuCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Christopher R. MooreHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard E. ClimanHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stewart L. McDowellGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Stanton D. WongPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Michelle A. HodgesGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- KENNETH R. LAMBGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eve N. HowardHogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2018 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lillian TsuCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Christopher R. MooreHogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard E. ClimanHogan Lovells US LLP | Dec 2017 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stewart L. McDowellGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 69 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.96 |
| Carmen ChangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Stanton D. WongPillsbury Winthrop | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.28 | 1.32 | 1.59 |
| Michelle A. HodgesGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| KENNETH R. LAMBGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.95 |