CapLease, Inc. LSE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1057689Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Venable LLP | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Mayer Brown | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven M. HaasHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brad S. MarkoffAlston & BirdFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- David C. WrightHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.24×
- Jeffrey M. SullivanDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven M. HaasHunton & Williams | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brad S. MarkoffAlston & Bird | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.92 | 1.26 | 0.73 |
| David C. WrightHunton & Williams | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Jeffrey M. SullivanDLA Piper | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |