INTERPLAY ENTERTAINMENT CORP IPLY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1057232Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shartsis Friese LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Stradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 165 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Jeffer MangelsFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shartsis Friese LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 52 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Akin Gump | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 165 | 1.18 | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| Jeffer Mangels | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 45 | 0.52 | 1.35 | 2.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- P. RUPERT RUSSELLShartsis Friese LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.84×
- John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- MURRAY MARKILESTroop Meisinger Steuber & Pasich, LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Jeffrey B. CoyneStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Nick E. YoccaStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.38× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Robert M. SteinbergJeffer MangelsFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P. RUPERT RUSSELLShartsis Friese LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.84 |
| John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| MURRAY MARKILESTroop Meisinger Steuber & Pasich, LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 1.07 | 1.38 |
| Jeffrey B. CoyneStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Nick E. YoccaStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 1.64 |
| Robert M. SteinbergJeffer Mangels | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.68 |