Internap Corp INAP (last ticker on record)

CIK 1056386Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
95% wipeout
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Bankruptcy
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 5; Newest began Mar 2020
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Jan 2004 to Mar 2020
Law firms: 14; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

May 8, 2020Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 16, 2020Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 16, 2020Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 13, 2017A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 31, 2016Shares down 95% from their high
Apr 2, 2009Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 7, 2005Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 1, 2005Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 1, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Jenner & Block	Nov 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	122	1.12	0.78	0.94
Warner Norcross & Judd	Jul 2011	Named in a filing	60	1.36	0.00	1.06
Fenwick & West LLP	Nov 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	443	0.95	0.21	1.23
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP	Nov 2006	Named in a filing	105	0.58	0.34	0.86
Pillsbury Winthrop	Sep 2006	Named in a filing	516	1.13	0.82	1.27
Kilpatrick Stockton	Feb 2004	Named in a filing	191	0.88	0.37	0.91
Paul Hastings	Jan 2004	Named in a filing	768	0.98	0.72	1.09
King & Spalding	Sep 2003	Named in a filing	426	1.28	0.35	1.04
Cooley LLP	Jul 1999	Named in a filing	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24
Parr Brown Gee & Loveless	Nov 2006	Text search only	33	2.04	2.78	1.21
Davis Polk	Feb 2004	Text search only	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Finn Dixon & Herling	Feb 2004	Text search only	28	1.29	0.76	2.33
Dewey Ballantine	Nov 2002	Text search only	228	2.03	0.29	0.87
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett	Nov 2002	Text search only	1,396	1.28	0.11	0.92

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	95% wipeout
Alexander J. MayJenner & Block	May 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	6	0.00	0.00
Thomas A. MonsonJenner & Block	Nov 2016	Named in SEC correspondence	12	1.76	1.57
Charlie GoodeWarner Norcross & Judd	Sep 2016	Named in a filing	16	3.01	1.01
Daniel C. PersingerWarner Norcross & Judd	Jun 2014	Named in a filing	7	1.88	0.69
Stephen C. WaterburyWarner Norcross & Judd	Jul 2011	Named in a filing	10	2.47	1.75
R. Gregory RousselFenwick & West LLP	Nov 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	9	1.39	0.80
GRANT W. COLLINGSWORTHMorris, Manning & Martin, LLP	Nov 2006	Named in a filing	5	2.04	2.07
Daniel T. FalstadTroutman Sanders LLP	Aug 2005	Named in a filing	8	2.54	1.29
John J. Kelley IIIKing & Spalding	Dec 2003	Named in a filing	26	1.41	0.39
Stephen W. FacklerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Nov 2002	Named in a filing	28	0.78	2.64
ERIC SCOTT CARNELLCooley LLP	Jan 2000	Named in a filing	7	1.00	2.36
Christopher W. WrightCooley LLP	Jul 1999	Named in a filing	6	2.04	1.87
Charles R. Beaudrot Jr.Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP	Nov 2006	Text search only	19	1.19	0.60