THOMSON REUTERS PLC
CIK 1056084Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Torys LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Slaughter and MayFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torys LLP | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Allen & Overy | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Slaughter and May | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel P. RaglanCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Andrew J. BeckTorys LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 2.11× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- John O ConnorSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel P. RaglanCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Andrew J. BeckTorys LLP | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.08 | 2.11 | 1.15 |
| John O ConnorSullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |