SCHOOL SPECIALTY INC SCOO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1055454Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Nov 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2018 to Oct 2020
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis F. ConnollyGusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.89×
- R. Scott KilgoreWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.20×
- Roger J. PattersonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 5.05×
- Thomas W. WhiteWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 3.72×
- GEORGE P. STAMASWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis F. ConnollyGusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.89 |
| R. Scott KilgoreWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 4.20 |
| Roger J. PattersonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 5.05 |
| Thomas W. WhiteWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.85 | 1.73 | 3.72 |
| GEORGE P. STAMASWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 2.22 |