SONOSITE INC SONO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1055355Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Bogle & Gates P.L.L.C.First linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 2.13× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gunderson Dettmer | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Heller Ehrman | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Perkins Coie | Mar 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Bogle & Gates P.L.L.C. | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.75 | 2.13 | 1.64 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan C. SmithFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Stephen M. GrahamOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan C. SmithFenwick & West LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 1.47 |
| Stephen M. GrahamOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Mar 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.40 | 0.66 | 0.55 |