Kansas City Southern de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
CIK 1055294Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- White & CaseFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & MosleFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Husch Blackwell | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.21 |
| White & Case | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| Arthur Cox | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 92 | 0.67 | 0.43 | 0.88 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.89 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Mayer Brown | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.23 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary KasharWhite & CaseFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Jeffrey T. HaugheyHusch BlackwellFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- John F MarvinSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Jeffrey N. OstragerCurtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & MosleFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary KasharWhite & Case | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Jeffrey T. HaugheyHusch Blackwell | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.83 | 1.41 | 0.83 |
| John F MarvinSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Jeffrey N. OstragerCurtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 2.32 |