CNL RETIREMENT PROPERTIES INC
CIK 1055264Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Arent FoxFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.First linked May 2002 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 2.33× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Shaw Pittman | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.04 |
| Arent Fox | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| Ballard Spahr | May 2002 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.78 |
| Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A. | May 2002 | Text search only | 19 | 0.87 | 2.33 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JAMES A. ULSH UIREMETTE, EVANS & WOODSIDEFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- THOMAS J. HAGGERTY UIREMuldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLPFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Judith D. FryerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- John M. McDonaldShaw PittmanFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas H. McCormickShaw PittmanFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAMES A. ULSH UIREMETTE, EVANS & WOODSIDE | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| THOMAS J. HAGGERTY UIREMuldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLP | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Judith D. FryerGreenberg Traurig | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| John M. McDonaldShaw Pittman | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas H. McCormickShaw Pittman | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |