INTERCEPT INC ICPT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1054930Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nelson Mullins | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Quarles & Brady | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles D. VaughnNelson MullinsFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Neil E. GraysonNelson MullinsFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Christopher D. StallFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Lawrence S. MakowWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Matthew M. GuestWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles D. VaughnNelson Mullins | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 1.39 |
| Neil E. GraysonNelson Mullins | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 44 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Christopher D. Stall | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Lawrence S. MakowWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 45 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Matthew M. GuestWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 67 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.50 |