FUNDTECH LTD FNDT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1054836Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Herzog Fox & NeemanFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Herzog Fox & Neeman | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard H. GildenKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Scott S. RosenblumKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- DAVID P. STONEWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- John BessonetteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.71×
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard H. GildenKramer Levin Naftalis | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Scott S. RosenblumKramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 1.40 |
| DAVID P. STONEWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| John BessonetteKramer Levin Naftalis | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.71 |
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |