HASTINGS ENTERTAINMENT INC HAST (last ticker on record)
CIK 1054579Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.21 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barbara L. BordenCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Kent JamisonLocke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara L. BordenCooley LLP | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.30 |
| Kent JamisonLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 2.17 |