21ST CENTURY FOX AMERICA, INC.
CIK 1054263Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| K&L Gates | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Herbert Smith | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & HartsonFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jeffrey W. RubinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- James R. MurdochFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & Hartson | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.55 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
| Jeffrey W. RubinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| James R. Murdoch | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |