INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES, INC. IDXG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1054102Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2016 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPFirst linked Jul 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Schulte LLP | Jul 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Pepper Hamilton | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 1.80 |
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Merrill M. KrainesFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Steven J. AbramsHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Joel J. GoldschmidtMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Kenneth S. RoseMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merrill M. KrainesFulbright & Jaworski | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 2.16 | 0.94 | 1.47 |
| Steven J. AbramsHogan Lovells US LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Joel J. GoldschmidtMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Kenneth S. RoseMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 1.63 |
| David E. DanovitchSullivan & Worcester LLP | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 85 | 0.88 | 1.89 | 1.25 |