WW INTERNATIONAL, INC. WW (last ticker on record)
CIK 105319Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2020 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Dickstein ShapiroFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Hunton & Williams | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Dickstein Shapiro | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Mayer Brown | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gillian Emmett MoldowanShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Kenneth B. WallachSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Steven R. ShoemateGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Robert E. SpattSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gillian Emmett MoldowanShearman & Sterling | Nov 2025 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Brian LaneGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Kenneth B. WallachSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Steven R. ShoemateGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 15 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Robert E. SpattSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 15 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.98 |