MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
CIK 1052636Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anna T. PinedoMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Elizabeth G. WrenKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.24×
- Richard W. ViolaMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- BOYD C. CAMPBELL JR.McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James R. TanenbaumMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Feb 2012 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna T. PinedoMorrison & Foerster | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 51 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Elizabeth G. WrenKilpatrick Stockton | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 13 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 3.24 |
| Richard W. ViolaMcGuireWoods LLP | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 12 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| BOYD C. CAMPBELL JR.McGuireWoods LLP | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 7 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James R. TanenbaumMorrison & Foerster | Feb 2012 | Text search only | 46 | 1.41 | 1.54 | 1.06 |