DSET CORP DSET (last ticker on record)
CIK 1052196Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2000 to Oct 2002
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Buchanan Ingersoll Professional CorporationFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTEREDFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jul 2001 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 123 | 1.14 | 0.73 | 1.47 |
| SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 78 | 0.98 | 1.75 | 1.36 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jul 2001 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard S. MattessichHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Tod K. ReichertHALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- William J. ThomasHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard S. MattessichHALE AND DORR | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Tod K. ReichertHALE AND DORR | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| William J. ThomasHALE AND DORR | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 1.33 |