CITIZENS SOUTH BANKING CORP CSBC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051871Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Helms Mulliss & WickerFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- Muldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Helms Mulliss & Wicker | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Luse Gorman, PC | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Muldoon Murphy Faucette & Aguggia LLP | Jun 2002 | Text search only | 161 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ned QuintLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward A. QuintLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- BOYD C. CAMPBELL JR.McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert B. PomerenkLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John J. GormanLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kenneth R. LehmanLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ned QuintLuse Gorman, PC | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward A. QuintLuse Gorman, PC | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| BOYD C. CAMPBELL JR.McGuireWoods LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert B. PomerenkLuse Gorman, PC | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John J. GormanLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kenneth R. LehmanLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |