FIRST NIAGARA FINANCIAL GROUP INC FNFG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051741Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- Bybel Rutledge LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Luse Gorman, PC | Dec 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Bybel Rutledge LLP | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 18 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul Hastings | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig S. WittlinHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.21×
- Daniel R. KinelHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Michael H. FriedmanPepper HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark J. WelshimerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- C. Andrew GerlachSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Margaret D. FarrellHinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Mitchell S. EitelSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- William W. Bouton IIITyler Cooper & Alcorn, LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- G. Daniel O DonnellLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ian A. HartmanDechert LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Amit SalujaHogan & HartsonFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Stuart G. SteinHogan & HartsonFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Marc P. LevyLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- John J. GormanLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kenneth R. LehmanLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig S. WittlinHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 2.21 |
| Daniel R. KinelHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Michael H. FriedmanPepper Hamilton | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark J. WelshimerSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| C. Andrew GerlachSullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Margaret D. FarrellHinckley Allen & Snyder | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Mitchell S. EitelSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| William W. Bouton IIITyler Cooper & Alcorn, LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| G. Daniel O DonnellLuse Gorman, PC | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ian A. HartmanDechert LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Amit SalujaHogan & Hartson | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Stuart G. SteinHogan & Hartson | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Marc P. LevyLuse Gorman, PC | Sep 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| John J. GormanLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kenneth R. LehmanLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |