UNITED DEFENSE INDUSTRIES INC UDI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051719Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- White & CaseFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Wyatt Tarrant & CombsFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| White & Case | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Wyatt Tarrant & Combs | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 53 | 1.40 | 0.35 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David M. McPhersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Mark A. StegemoellerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David M. McPhersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.74 |
| Mark A. StegemoellerLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |