Athene USA Corp AMH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051717Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Nyemaster Goode, P.C.First linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Nyemaster Goode, P.C. | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 20 | 0.67 | 1.20 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert B. WilliamsMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Robert Evans IIIShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- David J. GoldschmidtSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Andrew R. SchleiderShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert B. WilliamsMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.62 | 1.49 | 0.66 |
| Robert Evans IIIShearman & Sterling | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| David J. GoldschmidtSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.03 | 0.58 | 1.31 |
| Andrew R. SchleiderShearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.66 |