INNOTRAC CORP INOC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051114Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Mar 2004 to Feb 2009
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Kilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark D. WoodKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.79×
- Jeffrey R. PattKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 3.59×
- Jan M. DavidsonKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- David A. StocktonKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark D. WoodKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.79 |
| Jeffrey R. PattKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.28 | 1.78 | 3.59 |
| Jan M. DavidsonKilpatrick Stockton | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| David A. StocktonKilpatrick Stockton | Dec 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.38 |