W-H ENERGY SERVICES INC WHQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051034Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Bracewell LLP | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Michael S. TelleVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- James B. CarlsonMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Michael S. TelleVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.64 | 0.20 | 1.77 |
| James B. CarlsonMayer Brown | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 18 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 |