SHOE PAVILION INC SHOE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051009Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2006 to Oct 2008
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wickersham & MurphyFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 8.38×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wickersham & Murphy | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 8.38 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- A. John MurphyWickersham & MurphyFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 4.26× · 95% wipeout 5.41×
- Debra K. WeinerWickersham & MurphyFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 3.97×
- Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- John F. SeegalOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 6.02× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. John MurphyWickersham & Murphy | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.84 | 4.26 | 5.41 |
| Debra K. WeinerWickersham & Murphy | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.54 | 0.89 | 3.97 |
| Brett CooperOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.84 | 2.34 | 0.81 |
| John F. SeegalOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.69 | 6.02 | 0.96 |