PUBLICIS GROUPE SA SSA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1050952Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Davis Polk | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua R. CammakerWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Sami ToutounjiShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- SETH A. KAPLANWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Timothy B. GoodellWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua R. CammakerWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Sami ToutounjiShearman & Sterling | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| SETH A. KAPLANWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Timothy B. GoodellWhite & Case | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 1.59 | 0.73 |
| Gregory V. GoodingDebevoise & Plimpton | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 13 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.55 |