WJ COMMUNICATIONS INC WJCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 105006Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 70 | 0.49 | 1.01 | 1.37 |
| Irell & Manella | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Heller Ehrman | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Darrell C. SmithShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- MITCHELL S. PRESSERWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Henry LesserDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darrell C. SmithShumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| MITCHELL S. PRESSERWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Henry LesserDLA Piper | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.74 |