FIRST CONSULTING GROUP INC FCGI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1049758Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Saul Ewing | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin B. EspinolaLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin B. EspinolaLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.20 | 1.24 | 1.03 |