Delek Resources, Inc.
CIK 1049660Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph I. Emas Attorney at LawFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph I. Emas Attorney at Law | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.43 | 1.26 | 0.98 |
| K&L Gates | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Alina S. PastiuK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 4.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Joseph I. EmasJoseph I. Emas Attorney at LawFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Alina S. PastiuK&L Gates | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.52 | 4.12 | 1.35 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Joseph I. EmasJoseph I. Emas Attorney at Law | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 107 | 1.38 | 1.27 | 0.83 |