AVISTA CORP AVA (last ticker on record)
CIK 104918Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- PAINE HAMBLENFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.27×
- Reid & Priest LLPFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracewell LLP | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Heller Ehrman | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Perkins Coie | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| PAINE HAMBLEN | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 3.27 |
| Reid & Priest LLP | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Lawrence R. SmallPAINE HAMBLENFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.71×
- LINDA A. SCHOEMAKERPerkins CoieFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey BallantineFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Lawrence R. SmallPAINE HAMBLEN | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.71 |
| LINDA A. SCHOEMAKERPerkins Coie | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey Ballantine | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |