DEL MONTE CORP DMC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1047340Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- ADORNO & ZEDERFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| K&L Gates | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| ADORNO & ZEDER | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 9 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brown & Wood | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Jeffrey W. AcreK&L GatesFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Michael FrancisAkerman LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg Traurig | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.55 | 2.41 | 0.81 |
| Jeffrey W. AcreK&L Gates | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Michael FrancisAkerman LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.58 |