NATIONAL HEALTH REALTY INC NHR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1047334Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Waller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Harwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C.First linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 1.06 | 0.65 | 1.24 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
| Harwell Howard Hyne Gabbert & Manner, P.C. | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
| Venable LLP | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 506 | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.71 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- J. CHASE COLEWaller Lansden Dortch & DavisFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James J. ClarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| J. CHASE COLEWaller Lansden Dortch & Davis | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.71 |