EXE TECHNOLOGIES INC EXEE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1047262Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| HALE AND DORR | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DANIEL W. RABUNBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.52×
- David W. PollakMorgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- BARRY M. ABELSON UIREPepper HamiltonFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- CHRISTOPHER S. PETITO UIREJorden Burt LLPFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MICHAEL P. GALLAGHER UIREPepper HamiltonFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DANIEL W. RABUNBaker & McKenzie | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 2.52 |
| David W. PollakMorgan Lewis | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| BARRY M. ABELSON UIREPepper Hamilton | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| CHRISTOPHER S. PETITO UIREJorden Burt LLP | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MICHAEL P. GALLAGHER UIREPepper Hamilton | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |