RAYTHEON CO/ RTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1047122Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 212 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2020 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Morgan Lewis | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Hunton & Williams | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 212 | 0.95 | 0.45 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. Cannon IIIShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Jason C. HarmonDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Gary E. ThompsonHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Jeffrey SmallCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- John M. BrandowWilliams MullenFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Herbert J. HuffFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- John W. KapplesFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- William J. CurrySullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. Cannon IIIShearman & Sterling | Apr 2020 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Jason C. HarmonDLA Piper | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| Gary E. ThompsonHunton & Williams | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Jeffrey SmallCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| John M. BrandowWilliams Mullen | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Herbert J. Huff | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 38 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| John W. Kapples | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 91 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| William J. CurrySullivan & Worcester LLP | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.76 |