OMNI ENERGY SERVICES CORP OMNI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1046212Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jun 2007 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Locke LordFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Kelly Hart & HallmanFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locke Lord | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Sep 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Jones Walker | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Kelly Hart & Hallman | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 30 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michelle EarleyLocke LordFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 2.86×
- David F. TaylorLocke LordFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 2.68×
- Lisa M. BuchananJones WalkerFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.26×
- Margaret F. MurphyJones WalkerFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelle EarleyLocke Lord | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.09 | 1.59 | 2.86 |
| David F. TaylorLocke Lord | Sep 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.52 | 1.10 | 2.68 |
| Lisa M. BuchananJones Walker | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.26 |
| Margaret F. MurphyJones Walker | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 1.65 |