Track Group, Inc. TRCK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1045942Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2015 to Oct 2024
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Disclosure Law GroupFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Durham Jones & PinegarFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disclosure Law Group | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.42 | 0.88 | 1.08 |
| Durham Jones & Pinegar | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.70 | 1.06 | 1.40 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel W. RumseyDisclosure Law GroupFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Jessica R. SudweeksDisclosure Law GroupFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Wayne D. SwanDurham Jones & PinegarFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Kevin R. PinegarDurham Jones & PinegarFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 2.62×
- Mark N. SchneiderMark N. Schneider A Professional CorporationFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel W. RumseyDisclosure Law Group | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.54 | 1.16 | 1.19 |
| Jessica R. SudweeksDisclosure Law Group | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Wayne D. SwanDurham Jones & Pinegar | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 2.38 | 1.26 | 1.22 |
| Kevin R. PinegarDurham Jones & Pinegar | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 2.36 | 1.17 | 2.62 |
| Mark N. SchneiderMark N. Schneider A Professional Corporation | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 18 | 0.54 | 1.04 | 1.83 |