NVIDIA CORP NVDA (last ticker on record)

CIK 1045810Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restatement
Restructuring
SEC/DOJ scrutiny

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began May 2022
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 4; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 12; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

May 6, 2022SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
May 6, 2022SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
Sep 18, 2008Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 24, 2007A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Nov 6, 2006Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 12, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 24, 2003An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Sep 11, 2003SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
Sep 11, 2003SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Sep 11, 2003An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Sep 11, 2003An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Apr 25, 2003A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Latham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2020	Named in a filing	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Sep 2016	Named in a filing	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Fenwick & West LLP	Feb 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	443	0.95	0.21	1.23
Cooley LLP	Mar 1998	Named in SEC correspondence	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Sarah SellersCooley LLP	May 2025	Named in a filing	13	0.00	0.00	1.84
Natalie Y. KaramCooley LLP	Feb 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	12	0.88	0.00	0.00
Joshua M. DubofskyLatham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2020	Named in a filing	24	1.15	0.00	0.70
Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Sep 2016	Named in a filing	206	1.74	0.21	0.99
Scott P. SpectorFenwick & West LLP	Feb 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	7	1.75	0.00	2.04
William L. HughesFenwick & West LLP	Feb 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	41	1.12	0.94	1.37
John T. McKennaCooley LLP	Jan 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	97	0.53	0.43	1.10
Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLP	Jan 2001	Named in a filing	51	0.56	0.49	1.38
Virginia C. EdwardsCooley LLP	Oct 2000	Named in a filing	11	1.94	0.00	0.93
Eric C. JensenCooley LLP	Mar 1998	Named in SEC correspondence	66	0.58	0.00	0.97
KARYN R. SMITHCooley LLP	Mar 1998	Named in a filing	5	2.25	0.00	2.35
Andrei M. ManoliuCooley LLP	Jan 2001	Text search only	15	0.52	1.20	0.61