LIVE VENTURES Inc LIVE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1045742Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Feb 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Apr 2008 to Dec 2011
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clark HillFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Rogers & Theobald LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clark Hill | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 51 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Rogers & Theobald LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.05 | 1.37 | 1.97 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Aug 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephanie R. HagerStevens & LeeFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Daniel M. MahoneySnell & WilmerFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 2.04× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Bradford J. LamFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 2.94× · 95% wipeout 2.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie R. HagerStevens & Lee | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Daniel M. MahoneySnell & Wilmer | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.25 | 2.04 | 1.65 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Bradford J. Lam | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.67 | 2.94 | 2.65 |