ETELOS, INC. ETLO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1045739Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Feb 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jan 2004 to Dec 2005
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked May 2008 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- HYNES & LERACHFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard Mullin | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Duane Morris | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | May 2008 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| HYNES & LERACH | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 24 | 1.77 | 1.35 | 1.43 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James A. Mercer IIISheppard MullinFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Bret M. DiMarcoWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Nancy H. WojtasCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- JOHN M. FOGGDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.24× · 95% wipeout 3.59×
- Michael J. DanaherWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Raj S. JudgeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James A. Mercer IIISheppard Mullin | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 2.28 | 2.49 | 1.48 |
| David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Bret M. DiMarcoWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Nancy H. WojtasCooley LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 26 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| JOHN M. FOGGDLA Piper | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 5.24 | 3.59 |
| Michael J. DanaherWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.02 | 1.51 | 1.62 |
| Raj S. JudgeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 3.06 |