SCOTTISH POWER PLC
CIK 1045513Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 258 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 258 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard C. MorrisseySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- James H. Ball Jr.Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Sarah MurphyFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- M. DOUGLAS DUNNMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert B. WilliamsMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard C. MorrisseySullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| James H. Ball Jr.Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Sarah MurphyFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| M. DOUGLAS DUNNMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 0.00 |
| Robert B. WilliamsMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 15 | 1.62 | 1.49 | 0.61 |