ENCLAVES GROUP INC ALLC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1045260Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Eric P. LittmanFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| K&L Gates | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Eric P. Littman | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 26 | 0.32 | 2.29 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald S. HaligmanK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Troy J. RilloK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.98× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Eric P. LittmanEric P. LittmanFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 2.45× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald S. HaligmanK&L Gates | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.77 | 1.66 | 1.10 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Troy J. RilloK&L Gates | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.52 | 1.98 | 0.57 |
| David Gonzalez | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |
| Eric P. LittmanEric P. Littman | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 35 | 0.50 | 2.45 | 1.05 |