OFFICIAL PAYMENTS HOLDINGS, INC. OPAY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1045150Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Farella Braun & MartelFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Jones DayFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Bell Boyd & LloydFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| HALE AND DORR | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Paul Hastings | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Farella Braun & Martel | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.40 | 1.33 | 1.07 |
| Jones Day | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| K&L Gates | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Bell Boyd & Lloyd | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 50 | 1.36 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Foley & Lardner | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David BreachKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey SymonsKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brent B. SilerCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- D. Bradley PeckCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- MARIA L. PIZZOLIFarella Braun & MartelFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert A. ProfusekJones DayFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David BreachKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2013 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey SymonsKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2013 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brent B. SilerCooley LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 51 | 0.40 | 0.57 | 1.70 |
| D. Bradley PeckCooley LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| MARIA L. PIZZOLIFarella Braun & Martel | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert A. ProfusekJones Day | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 47 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.93 |