ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE INC ELIX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1044827Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Mar 2000 to Nov 2001
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & RobertsFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & MosleFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Fleischman and WalshFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.18 | 0.53 | 1.77 |
| Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle | May 2002 | Text search only | 35 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Fleischman and Walsh | May 2002 | Text search only | 12 | 2.50 | 1.31 | 1.22 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. BlockCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 49 | 1.46 | 0.73 | 1.23 |