Intermec, Inc. IN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1044590Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Snow Becker Krauss P.C.First linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Snow Becker Krauss P.C. | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.50 | 1.67 | 1.42 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. Sue MorganPerkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Eric HonickSnow Becker Krauss P.C.First linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 2.56× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- John L. SavvaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Sue MorganPerkins Coie | Mar 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Eric HonickSnow Becker Krauss P.C. | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.33 | 2.56 | 1.42 |
| John L. SavvaSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 1.12 |