CNA SURETY CORP SUR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1044566Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Timothy P. FitzSimonsKing & SpaldingFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- David S. StoneNeal Gerber & EisenbergFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Christopher MaySimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Timothy P. FitzSimonsKing & Spalding | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| David S. StoneNeal Gerber & Eisenberg | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| Christopher MaySimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 1.79 |