MEDICAL SOLUTIONS MANAGEMENT INC. MSMT (last ticker on record)
CIK 104401Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Parr Brown Gee & LovelessFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 2.78× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- The Baum Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Gary B. Wolff, P.C.First linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parr Brown Gee & Loveless | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 33 | 2.04 | 2.78 | 1.21 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| The Baum Law Firm | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 22 | 2.77 | 1.72 | 0.32 |
| Gary B. Wolff, P.C. | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 52 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.64 |
| Quarles & Brady | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael L. CorriganLaw Offices of Michael L. CorriganFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.78× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael L. CorriganLaw Offices of Michael L. Corrigan | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 35 | 2.78 | 1.11 | 1.04 |
| Mark L. BaumThe Baum Law Firm | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 20 | 2.75 | 2.05 | 1.01 |