AMERICAN SKIING CO /ME AESK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1043432Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David J. ChampouxPierce AtwoodFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- THOMAS L. FAIRFIELDLeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert B. LoperSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David J. ChampouxPierce Atwood | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| THOMAS L. FAIRFIELDLeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert B. LoperSchulte Roth & Zabel | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |